An automated wet laser diffraction particle size analysis system integrates automatic slurry sampling, water addition, ultrasonic dispersion, laser diffraction measurement, and data communication into a coordinated workflow. For battery material production, it can reduce repetitive manual sampling, standardize sample preparation, and automatically transfer particle size results to DCS, MES, or other compatible production systems. Its performance depends on sample properties, process conditions, instrument configuration, and measurement validation.
Automated sampling: Collect slurry samples from designated process points using electrically or pneumatically controlled valves.
Wet sample preparation: Add a controlled amount of water and use external ultrasonic dispersion before measurement.
Automated measurement: Coordinate sample transfer, instrument operation, and measurement sequencing through control software.
Multi-point monitoring: Schedule measurements across multiple production lines or grinding units.
Data integration: Transfer generated particle size data to compatible DCS, MES, or other customer systems.
Reduced manual workload: Minimize repetitive operator intervention while improving consistency in sampling and testing procedures.
An automated wet laser diffraction particle size analysis system is an integrated testing solution that combines a laser diffraction particle size analyzer with automated sampling equipment, sample preparation devices, valve controls, and data communication software.
Unlike a conventional workflow in which an operator manually collects slurry, prepares the sample, runs the analyzer, and records the results, an automated system coordinates these steps according to predefined test schedules or external control signals.
The system is particularly relevant to manufacturing processes where particle size distribution is an important process indicator. Examples include lithium iron phosphate (LFP) battery materials, ceramic slurries, mineral suspensions, and other industrial materials that require wet particle size measurement.
In a typical battery material application, slurry is sampled from a designated point in the pipeline between a fine grinding machine and a slurry tank. The sample is diluted with clean water, dispersed using an external ultrasonic device, and transferred to the particle size analyzer for testing.
After each measurement, the system generates particle size data and can send the results to the customer's designated information or control systems.
The primary purpose is to automate the complete sampling-to-data workflow, rather than simply automating the particle size analyzer itself.
Production lines may require frequent particle size measurements to support process monitoring and adjustment. When operators must manually collect and prepare samples from several locations, the workload can increase significantly.
An automated slurry sampling system uses controlled valves and a coordinated sampling sequence to collect material from designated points. This reduces routine manual handling and helps establish a more standardized testing procedure.
Particle size results can be affected by sampling location, sample quantity, dilution, dispersion conditions, and the time between sampling and measurement.
Automation allows sampling duration, water addition, valve sequence, and ultrasonic dispersion steps to be configured according to the validated process. This can reduce operator-dependent variation, although the resulting measurement accuracy must still be confirmed through method validation and comparison with reference measurements.
In grinding and dispersion processes, particle size distribution is an important indicator of material condition.
Automated measurement can provide scheduled or externally triggered results without requiring an operator to initiate every test manually. The resulting data can support process review and production decisions.
However, a scheduled automated measurement system is not necessarily a continuous, real-time sensor. The interval between measurements depends on the number of sampling points, test duration, cleaning requirements, and the configured sequence.
An automated particle size analysis system can be designed to transfer test results to DCS, MES, or other compatible systems.
This connection helps reduce manual data transcription and allows particle size results to be reviewed alongside production records. Actual communication protocols, data fields, and control permissions should be confirmed during system integration.
A typical system consists of five main stages.
A sampling assembly is installed at a designated location on the production pipeline.
The assembly may include:
T-type three-way ball valves
Solenoid valves
Pneumatically actuated two-way ball valves
Flow meters
Pressure-reducing valves
Stainless steel sampling tubing
Signal connections to the control system
In the referenced LFP slurry project, the sampling point is located on the pipeline between the fine grinding machine and the slurry tank.
When the sampling sequence starts, the designated valve opens for a configured period. The sampling duration is adjusted according to the application requirements and should be validated against the quantity and representativeness of the collected slurry.
After sampling, the system closes the sampling valve and opens the designated clean-water valve.
Water is added to the sample to prepare it for wet laser diffraction measurement. The amount of water and the resulting sample concentration must be suitable for the instrument and the material being tested.
The project configuration uses controlled water supply and pressure-reducing components. The water quantity and valve sequence can be adjusted during commissioning according to the actual slurry characteristics.
An external ultrasonic device is used to disperse the prepared slurry before measurement.
This stage helps address particle agglomeration that may affect the measured particle size distribution. Ultrasonic power and treatment duration should be established through testing because excessive or insufficient dispersion can affect results, depending on the material.
The objective is to achieve a reproducible dispersion condition without unintentionally changing the particles being measured.
After the preparation sequence, the system transfers the sample to the instrument's sample introduction unit.
The referenced technical proposal specifies the FRITSCH A22 NeXT Nano laser particle size analyzer. The analyzer performs the measurement under its configured operating conditions and generates particle size data.
The measurement cycle is coordinated by the particle size software assistant, which works with the control equipment to manage the sequence of valves and instrument operations.
The reported test duration in the proposal is approximately 3–4 minutes per measurement point. This is a project-specific reference, not a guaranteed total cycle time for every material or installation. Sample preparation, transfer, flushing, and scheduling can increase the time required to complete a full multi-point cycle.
After a test is completed, the software generates the particle size measurement data and automatically sends the results to designated customer systems.
Depending on the integration scope, these may include:
Distributed Control Systems (DCS)
Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES)
Grinding equipment control systems
Other compatible production data platforms
The data interface should define the required measurement results, sample point identification, timestamps, status information, communication method, and handling of failed or incomplete tests.
A validated data flow makes particle size measurements easier to associate with production conditions and historical process records.
The automated wet laser diffraction system can be understood as four coordinated layers.
| System layer | Main components | Primary function |
|---|---|---|
| Sampling and fluid handling | Sampling valves, tubing, flow meters, pressure regulators | Collect slurry and control fluid movement |
| Sample preparation | Clean-water supply and external ultrasonic device | Dilute and disperse the sample |
| Measurement and control | Laser diffraction analyzer, PLC control cabinet, computer, operating software | Execute the measurement sequence |
| Data communication | Network and signal connections, software interfaces | Transfer results to designated production systems |
The architecture connects the physical sampling process with instrument measurement and production data management.
The detailed configuration should be determined by the number of sampling points, line layout, slurry characteristics, required measurement frequency, utility availability, and the customer's existing control infrastructure.
Lithium iron phosphate (LFP) battery material production is one application in which automated particle size measurement can support process monitoring.
Grinding and slurry preparation operations may require repeated testing to understand changes in particle size distribution. Manual sampling can become labor-intensive when several fine grinding units operate in parallel.
The referenced engineering proposal describes a multi-point system for LFP slurry produced during fine grinding.
| Item | Configuration described in the technical proposal |
|---|---|
| Application | LFP slurry particle size measurement |
| Sampling location | Pipeline between fine grinding machines and slurry tanks |
| Production arrangement | Eight production lines, with four fine grinding units per line as described in the project requirements |
| Analyzer configuration | Two laser particle size analyzers, each assigned to four lines |
| Sample preparation | Controlled water addition and external ultrasonic dispersion |
| Measurement sequence | Scheduled cyclic testing or testing triggered by an external DCS signal |
| Reference measurement duration | Approximately 3–4 minutes per point, subject to actual conditions |
| Control equipment | Two control cabinets with PLC and touchscreen |
| Data processing | Computer-based particle size software |
| Data destination | Customer DCS, MES, or other designated systems |
The proposal also specifies a broader supply scope that includes two particle size analyzers, sampling assemblies, control cabinets, computers, displays, and software.
The final number of sampling assemblies and the detailed mapping between production lines, grinding units, and analyzers should be confirmed during detailed engineering. The proposal's general equipment list and project-specific line arrangement should be reconciled before procurement.
The system is designed to address several practical challenges.
Reduced operator workload: Routine sampling and testing can be coordinated automatically, reducing the need for operators to perform every step manually.
More standardized procedures: Configurable valve sequences, dilution steps, and dispersion conditions help establish repeatable sample preparation.
Multi-point testing: A shared analyzer arrangement can serve several designated sampling locations, subject to the validated cycle time and production monitoring requirements.
Centralized data availability: Automatically generated results can be transferred to designated information systems, reducing reliance on manual recording.
Support for process evaluation: Timely particle size data can help process engineers evaluate grinding performance and investigate changes in material characteristics.
These benefits should be verified against baseline operating data and agreed acceptance criteria during commissioning and performance evaluation.
Automated online sampling and laboratory-based offline testing serve different purposes. The appropriate choice depends on how frequently measurements are needed, how samples are handled, and how results are used.
| Comparison factor | Manual offline testing | Automated multi-point wet laser diffraction system |
|---|---|---|
| Sample collection | Operator collects each sample | Controlled sampling at configured points |
| Sample preparation | Performed manually or semi-automatically | Water addition and ultrasonic dispersion can be automated |
| Measurement initiation | Operator starts each test | Scheduled or externally triggered testing |
| Multiple sampling points | Requires repeated operator handling | Sampling sequence can be coordinated across points |
| Data recording | May require manual transcription | Results can be transferred automatically to compatible systems |
| Labor requirements | Higher for frequent repetitive tests | Reduced routine intervention |
| Measurement interval | Depends on operator workflow | Depends on cycle time, number of points, and cleaning requirements |
| Best suited for | Occasional checks, method development, reference testing | Repetitive process monitoring and standardized multi-point testing |
A
utomation does not eliminate the need for laboratory verification. Offline testing can remain important for method validation, troubleshooting, and confirming that the automated sampling procedure represents the actual production material.
Before selecting the system, evaluate slurry viscosity, solids concentration, particle characteristics, sedimentation behavior, and compatibility with the proposed sampling path.
The sampling assembly must collect material representative of the production process. Sampling duration, pipeline geometry, and potential settling or blockage should be evaluated under actual operating conditions.
Water addition and ultrasonic treatment must be compatible with the material and the required measurement method.
The preparation procedure should define dilution conditions, ultrasonic treatment parameters, and any relevant dispersion requirements. The procedure must also be checked to ensure that sample preparation does not introduce unacceptable changes in the measured particle size distribution.
The selected laser diffraction analyzer must be suitable for the target particle size range, sample characteristics, and wet measurement method.
For the referenced project, the proposed instrument is the FRITSCH A22 NeXT Nano. Its suitability for a specific application should be assessed using the instrument's technical specifications, sample requirements, and application testing.
The number of sampling points directly affects how often each point can be measured.
For example, if a system tests points sequentially, adding more points increases the time needed to complete a full cycle unless additional analyzers or parallel measurement capacity are provided.
A practical capacity assessment should include:
Measurement duration per point
Sampling and sample-transfer time
Water addition and ultrasonic dispersion
Pipeline and instrument cleaning
Repeat measurements and failed-test handling
External requests from the production control system
The resulting cycle time should be compared with the process team's required monitoring interval before the system is finalized.
Data integration requires more than connecting a network cable.
The engineering scope should define the communication interface, data format, point identifiers, measurement status, error handling, and responsibilities of the instrument software and the customer's systems.
If the production system is expected to trigger a measurement, the integration should also specify how requests are queued, prioritized, acknowledged, and handled when the analyzer is busy.
Automated wet systems require an appropriate cleaning sequence to reduce sample carryover and maintain reliable operation.
The referenced design uses controlled water flow to flush the sampling pipeline, with cleaning duration determined according to actual operating conditions.
For applications with different materials or strict contamination limits, the cleaning procedure should be validated by checking residual material, carryover, and the effect of cleaning on subsequent measurements.
The referenced project proposal identifies the following utility and installation requirements:
| Utility or connection | Reference requirement |
|---|---|
| Electrical supply | Single-phase 220 V, 10 A; stated power consumption below 2 kW |
| Compressed air | 0.2–0.5 MPa |
| Clean water | Clean-water supply; the proposal specifies pressure above 1 kgf/cm² |
| Instrument water inlet | Supply pressure not exceeding 2 kgf/cm² |
| Sampling-point tubing | 8 mm tubing specified in the proposal |
| Analyzer drainage | 32 mm drain connection to the designated drainage collection point |
| Signal wiring | Ten-core, 24 V signal cable between the analyzer and sampling location |
These values are reference requirements from the project proposal, not universal specifications for every installation. Confirm the final utility design, connection sizes, pressure limits, drainage arrangements, and applicable site standards with the selected instrument supplier and integration team.
A structured implementation process helps reduce integration risks.
Document the production process, slurry characteristics, sampling locations, required measurement interval, and target data destinations.
Identify whether testing will run on a fixed schedule, in response to DCS requests, or through a combination of both.
Develop the sampling layout, valve arrangement, analyzer allocation, control cabinet configuration, utility requirements, and data communication architecture.
Confirm the required number of sampling assemblies and the expected measurement capacity.
Prepare the analyzer, sampling assemblies, control equipment, and data processing components according to the approved scope.
Review the equipment configuration and conduct the agreed inspections before shipment.
Install the sampling hardware, connect utilities, arrange signal wiring, and configure the analyzer software.
Coordinate the integration with the customer's production control and manufacturing data systems.
Test each sampling point, verify the valve sequence, evaluate dilution and ultrasonic dispersion, and confirm that particle size results are generated and transferred correctly.
Compare automated results with an appropriate reference method to assess sampling representativeness and measurement consistency.
Train operators and technical personnel in system operation, routine maintenance, troubleshooting, and emergency procedures.
The referenced proposal includes a 12-month warranty period and technical service commitments. Final service levels should be confirmed in the signed contract.
A wet laser diffraction particle size analyzer measures particle size distribution from a sample dispersed in a liquid. The system analyzes the light-scattering pattern generated when the dispersed particles interact with a laser beam and calculates a particle size distribution using its measurement model.
It is an integrated solution that connects slurry sampling, liquid addition, dispersion, laser diffraction measurement, and data output. Depending on the configuration, the process can run on a predefined schedule or be initiated by an external control signal.
Yes, an appropriately configured system can automate sampling and wet laser diffraction testing for LFP slurry. Suitability depends on the material properties, sampling representativeness, dispersion method, analyzer specifications, and validation results.
The referenced project proposal specifies approximately 3–4 minutes per measurement point. Actual cycle time may be longer when sampling, dilution, ultrasonic dispersion, transfer, flushing, and other operational steps are included.
Yes, a shared analyzer can be configured to test multiple sampling points sequentially, provided that its capacity meets the required monitoring interval. The number of points served by each analyzer must be determined through cycle-time and process-capacity calculations.
Yes, the system can be designed to transfer measurement results to compatible DCS, MES, or other customer systems. The required communication interface, data fields, triggering logic, and fault-handling rules must be defined during integration.
No. Automation can improve procedural consistency and reduce manual handling, but it does not automatically guarantee greater measurement accuracy. Accuracy depends on representative sampling, appropriate dispersion, instrument suitability, calibration or verification practices, and validated operating procedures.
Routine maintenance may include inspection of sampling valves and tubing, checking water and compressed-air supplies, verifying drainage, cleaning sample-contact components, and reviewing instrument performance and data communication. The final maintenance schedule should follow the instrument manufacturer's instructions and the validated application procedure.
An automated wet laser diffraction particle size analysis system connects sample collection, wet preparation, particle size measurement, and production data management into a coordinated workflow.
For LFP slurry production and similar industrial applications, this approach can reduce repetitive manual testing, support standardized multi-point measurements, and make particle size data available to production systems more efficiently.
Successful implementation depends on more than selecting a laser diffraction analyzer. Sampling representativeness, slurry compatibility, dispersion conditions, system capacity, cleaning procedures, and DCS/MES integration must all be considered during engineering and commissioning.
For manufacturers seeking to automate particle size testing, the most effective starting point is to define the required monitoring interval, sampling locations, material properties, and data interface before finalizing the system configuration.
Automated Pipetting System: Types, Benefits, Applications, and Selection Guide
2026-10-23Indonesia Lithium Battery Laboratory Design: Layout, Equipment, Safety, and Automation
2026-10-23Lithium Battery Laboratory Automation Design: Layout, Equipment Integration, Safety, and Implementation
2026-10-22
Automated Pipetting System: Types, Benefits, Applications, and Selection Guide
2026.10.23
Indonesia Lithium Battery Laboratory Design: Layout, Equipment, Safety, and Automation
2026.10.23
Lithium Battery Laboratory Automation Design: Layout, Equipment Integration, Safety, and Implementation
2026.10.22
Automated Wet Laser Diffraction Particle Size Analysis System for Slurry Production
2026.10.20
Copyright © Zhejiang Qibiao Intelligent Laboratory Technology Co., Ltd. All Rights Reserved.Zhejiang ICP No. 2024131427-1
